Immediate and Recent Reaction to Jewett
Jewett’s
publications were instantly met with great merit by her audience; however, she
had some initial trouble getting published. In a letter written home during the
summer of her first publication, Jewett wrote that her efforts at the reading
club as well as verbal responses to the poetry she published were “met with
great applause” (Webb). It is no wonder that her return home coincided with her
first real attempts to publish her work to a greater audience. Jewett was
always seeking “the largest possible audience and sphere of influence. She
would always try to balance the needs of both the ‘serious’ and the
‘pleasure-seeking’ reader” (Webb). Her original attempts focused primarily on
poetry but discouragement led her to try her hand at fiction. In 1968-1969, she
bombarded children’s as well as adult’s magazines with her work. Only on her
third attempt, “Mr. Bruce” appeared in The Atlantic (Blanchard 73). During this same time, one of her
children’s poems, “The Baby-House Famine”, was accepted for Our Young
Folks (Webb).
During this period
of exploration, Jewett’s letters to editors were seemingly light-hearted but
many critics believe that there is evidence that she had “high expectations for
her writing” (Blanchard 58-59) from the very beginning. She was very
disconcerted when The Atlantic refused another of her works the following year
after “Mr. Bruce”. Following two more rejected submissions, Jewett wrote a
letter to the editors of The
Atlantic
flat-out asking if she should give up her career as a writer. However, her old friend William Dean
Howells had recently taken over the editor’s chair and replied to Jewett,
urging her not to give up. In
fact, he had told her it was "eminently worth while" (Sklar) for her
to continue her efforts, though he did guide her away from poetry, which had
been the principal of her affection. His response revived Jewett as a writer
and began the onset of her career (Webb; Howard 372).
Jewett’s work was
met with early positive criticism. She was a prolific author, publishing her
first major story in 1868, when she was just nineteen years old, and the next
year another story became the first of many of her works to appear in Atlantic
Monthly, as well as other prestigious
magazines. She gained a close relationship with William Dean Howells, an editor
of the Atlantic. Howells
encouraged her to collect several sketches and use them as inspiration for a
fictional framework. These sketches became the basis for her 1877 novel, Deephaven. Exceptional collections of stories and similar
sketches followed: Old
Friends and New (1879), Country By-ways
(1881), A White
Heron and Other Stories (1886), and A Native of Winby and Other Tales (1893).
In between her major novels and short
stories, Jewett wrote successful childrens’ books, including Play
Days (1878), The
Story of the
Normans (1887), and Betty
Leicester (1890). Her novels included A
Country Doctor (1884), A Marsh
Island (1885), and the book generally
considered to be her masterpiece, The Country of Pointed Firs (1896).
Recent criticism
of Jewett’s regionalist poetry, and the local color genre as a whole, seeks to
“reevalu[ate] regionalism from a different point of view, developing the
relational perspective on regionalism proposed by Raymond Williams” (Howard
386). Both
contemporary criticism
on Jewett’s work specifically, as well as critical literature on regionalism as
“the botanical metaphor of rootedness” (Howard 366) suggest that this genre of
literature has a natural connection to a particular place which implies an
almost immobility, restraining the literature to the confinements of that place
and time. This idea is often evoked in Jewett critics by an image used by F.O.
Matthiessen in the opening sentence of his 1929 biography: “The first thing she
could remember was a world bounded by the white paling fences around her house”
(Matthiessen I). The portrayal of a fence embodies the idea of closure and
detention. Many current feminist critics as well as others describe Jewett’s
work as lacking in plot but vivid in character development.
|